Climate tech VC argues Bitcoin’s ESG cons overweigh its negatives 31:1

By Clark

The Bitcoin network has a 31:1 positive to negative rate, according to climate tech VC Daniel Batten.

A climate tech investor has painted a bright view of the Bitcoin network, suggesting its environmental cons overweigh its negatives by a whopping 31:1 rate.

On Jan. 12, tone- placarded philanthropist and environmentalist Daniel Batten claimed in a Twitter thread that “ Bitcoin is presumably the most important ESG technology of our time. ”

According to Batten, the 311 positive impact rate was calculated by probing and canvassing grid masterminds, climate scientists, Bitcoin mining masterminds, methane abatement experts and solar and wind installers.

The findings discovered 21 ways Bitcoin

BTC tickers down$ 18,905 could be environmentally positive and just five ways it could be environmentally negative.

Batten said that the findings were “ uncannily analogous ” to those for the solar assiduity.

numerous of the cons involved renewable energy grids and benefits from mining, similar as being the leading technology for responding to grid power demand from over and undersupply. Depending on power demand constraints, Bitcoin mining granges can switch on or off.

Also, BTC mining can be a result for geographic curtailment. Power curtailment is a deliberate reduction in the affair below what could be produced to balance energy force and demand, or due to transmission constraints.

There are also benefits in invention and methane reduction, according to Batten’s findings.

BTC mining can be used to reduce vented tip gas and flare gas emigrations by using this otherwise wasted energy to power equipages.

The sprinkle of negatives included network emigration situations,e-waste products and the opening up of former reactionary energy spots. still, the environmental cons far overbalanced these negatives, according to Batten, who editorialized

“ Bitcoin mining’s rapid-fire renewable relinquishment can inspire other assiduity sectors to follow. ”

“ We see Bitcoin mining can play a real part in global methane mitigation, ” he concluded.

OnJan. 13, the South China Morning Post opposed the notion that Bitcoin was good for the terrain, by reporting that BTC accounted for 86.3 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions in 2022.

Still, it did admit that Ethereum saw its CO2 emissions drop from 21.95 million tons in 2021 to 8,824 tons last time, according to the data from Forex Suggest. Ethereum’s switch to evidence- of- stake in September 2022 reduced network power consumption by 99.98%.